Al Tabari Volume 6 Page 111 ((hot))
is one of the most debated passages in Islamic historiography. This volume, titled Muhammad at Mecca
: The text states that the angel Gabriel visited Muhammad that evening to review the newly revealed Surah.
Page 111 of The History of al-Ṭabarī, Volume VI , typically appears within the section recounting how early believers dealt with the severe persecution by the Quraysh, prompting some Muslims to migrate to Abyssinia. al tabari volume 6 page 111
Al-Tabari recounts how the Abbasid Caliph orders his trusted lieutenants to scour the region. The efficiency of the Abbasid intelligence network is highlighted. They are not merely fighting a war of armies but conducting a strategic removal of the old elite. The agents track Ubaydallah’s movements as he attempts to navigate the changing political landscape.
, refers to the controversial "Satanic Verses" incident. In this passage, Muhammad is described as being distressed after realizing he had mistakenly included verses praising pagan deities, believing they were from God when they were actually "cast" by Satan. is one of the most debated passages in
Al-Tabari’s methodology was to record reports without necessarily validating them, leaving the analysis to the reader. This included recording the controversial alongside the accepted, which is why the account appears in his History . Summary of the Event Description Volume/Page Volume VI, Page 111 Subject The "Satanic Verses" Incident Key Narrative Muhammad's confession of uttering false verses. Key Quote "I have fabricated things against God..." Context Reconciliation attempt with Quraysh (Mecca).
Alternatively, here is a for an article you could write if you have access to the correct volume: Al-Tabari recounts how the Abbasid Caliph orders his
Non-Muslim secular historians, such as William Montgomery Watt, often viewed the incident with historical curiosity, arguing that early Muslims would unlikely invent a story that seemed superficially embarrassing to their prophet. Conversely, Islamic apologists and scholars emphasize that early historical works like The History of al-Tabari were never meant to be read as absolute scripture, but rather as raw compilations requiring rigorous source criticism.
